That's it. I'm Committing Myself to the Face Sitting Fanatics Funny Farm of Face Fuckery! I think its possible, that I might, perhaps, just perchance, may well be...out of control. 😵 😬
Nope..no, it does not, one has nothing to do with the other. This effort has nothing to do with kids, it has to do with religious fundamentalists wanting to force their version of "Christian Taliban" laws onto everyone else. You don't want your kids seeing porn (or violence, or how to make bombs, or info encouraging bulimia or self harm) act like a fucking adult and restrict what your kids have access to. The Internet is not....your babysitter.
This is most unfortunate...men are and have been getting a raw deal in the USA for years, maybe decades. More women go to college than men, and as a result of that more women are making increased salaries, more women are into "hook up" culture, but are mostly "banging" a small percent of men, meaning the same guys are banging most of the women and the rest of the guys are...getting nothing. Fewer people are getting married, and in some cases, based on the very "unscientific" meme below, one can sort of see why many men would not want to get married. So, if you factor in less income, less sex, less friendships, less opportunity, more isolation, and obviously other factors, it means a lot of guys are...lonely. Just not good.
Roles have reversed, or at least altered, and so many guys are unsure of what society expects of them, and they're making a huge mistake by...giving a fuck. Go to the gym. Work. Work out. Educate yourselves. Engage in self care for yourself, enjoy your own hobbies,live your own life, and if/when you meet someone worthy of your time and energy, go with it, otherwise, find happiness anyway. Just keep in mind, for the most part women's "value" in society as far as the dating pool diminishes with age, and generally speaking, men's goes up.
That's more than 10 times what the federal government spent on education.
That's about...2.4 billion dollars...per day. Over 2 billion dollars, daily. For what? Are we at war? Nope. Are the soldiers overpaid? Nope. Are the Vets using the VA taken care of? Not really. So...where does this money go?
For the airframe and mission equipment only, the Lot 15-17 cost of F-35s ranges “from $70.2 million to $69.9 million for the F-35A, $80.9 million to $78.3 million for the F-35B, and $90 to $89.3 million for the F-35C,” a Lockheed spokesperson said. The whole "package" meaning to order a bunch of them...$412 Billion. Pushing a half a trillion dollars. So, we got some massively overpriced fighter jets, ready to kick ass...as long as the war is not anywhere near...rain.
So, we got nearly $1300 coffee cups, in planes, that can't fly in the rain, but our kids can barely read or write, what in the living fuck is wrong with this picture? I'm so glad you asked. It's called the Military/Industrial/Congressional Complex. It's a few "fat cats" getting billionaire rich, off of tax payer dollars, wasting exorbitant amounts of money...while our schools go broke and some of our kids are dumber than a box of sand. 'Murica!!! :)
Okay, so hear me out on this, lol. Let me develop my point. First off, I am not a "Royal Watcher", by any means, so I know very little about this or them. However, it's been on the back of my mind, just a faint thought, for years. Charles meets Camilla many decades ago, they have a fling, then he meets Diana and is pressured into marrying her. He's still seeing Camilla, we all know the tragic story, Diana is gone, Charles hooks back up with Camilla, publicly, and they wed. Got it.
Sure, there could be a bond, some mutual interests in hobbies, art, culture, global events, history, whatever, where Charles and Camilla might be better suited for each other, more so than Charles and Diana were. And while Camilla is/was an attractive woman in her own right, Diana was much more the "beauty queen", more fashionable, stylish, engaging, the media, public, cameras and TV loved her.
However, and this was part of Diana's charm, she sort of came across, at least in the early years, as the "virginal" good girl, the nice sweet innocent young thing, coquettish, but in a naive way, whereas Camilla seems a bit "rougher" around the edges, more experienced, bossy, demanding, domineering, but in a motherly sort of way.
Charles has had a very unique life, odd, strange, and his own mother seemed a tad distant and even "cold" due to her own upbringing, her generation, her duties and obligations, maintaining her image and all that. So, without going into a whole bunch of psychobabble, was Charles always longing for affection from a "motherly" woman, melded with a certain firmness, a "MomDom" of sorts, which drew him to Camilla, who seems to display some of those characteristics, far more so than Diana ever did?
I mean, all those jodhpurs, leather boots, riding gear, the equestrian accouterments, the leather, saddles, bridles, the riding crops...I've picked up on a vibe that suggests some of that might have been used on more than just the horses. Or is it...just me? I mean...Le Vice Anglais, translates to "The Englishmans Vice" mostly meaning spanking, beating, BDSM etc...you know, they fucking "invented" it, lol, or at least popularized it. Or, maybe I'm totally wrong...and just need a hobby. :)
You don't agree to settle and pay over 3/4's of a billion dollars, (yes a billion) unless you are as guilty as fuck and know you're going to end up paying twice as much, or much more, plus having your shady business practices, your lies to the viewers, your "dirty laundry" exposed, thereby proving that you are not a news organization, but simply an unpatriotic opinion fluff channel, designed to make obscene profits by lying to simpletons that watch and believe the lies you've been pimping for almost 30 years.
Fox News Bimbos.
Do I detect a "pattern" here, lol.
The lawsuit was about Fox News lying how Trump won the election.
Trump lost...by over 8 million votes...it wasn't even really close.
Video Showing Why Fox News is Popular With Men and has High Ratings. :)
Raging Morons Raging with False Outrage about Fictional Issues For Ratings.
Trumpie...sounding off again last night. The timing, related to Fox News...just hilarious. By the way, the "large scale cheating"...yeah, that was Trump and the GOP...proven by their own words, on tape, on video, and through court documents, and convictions. :)
"IF FOX WOULD FINALLY ADMIT THAT THERE WAS LARGE SCALE CHEATING & IRREGULARITIES IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, WHICH WOULD BE A GOOD THING FOR THEM, & FOR AMERICA, THE CASE AGAINST THEM, WHICH SHOULD NOT HAVE EXISTED AT ALL, WOULD BE GREATLY WEAKENED," the former president wrote. "BACK UP THOSE PATRIOTS AT FOX INSTEAD OF THROWING THEM UNDER THE BUS - & THEY ARE RIGHT! THERE IS SOOO MUCH PROOF, LIKE MASS BALLOT STUFFING CAUGHT ON GOVERNMENT CAMERAS, FBI COLLUDING WITH TWITTER & FACEBOOK, STATE LEGISLATURES NOT USED, etc."
A hermaphrodite (/hərˈmæfrəˌdaɪt/) is a sexually reproducing organism that produces both male and female gametes. Animal species in which individuals are of different sexes, either male or female but not both, are gonochoric, which is the opposite of hermaphrodite.
Intersex people are individuals born with any of several sex characteristics including chromosome patterns, gonads, or genitals that, according to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, "do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies".
It sometimes seems like the majority of GOP politicians...have no education...at all. :)
By the way, our far left? Yeah, every bit as bat guano fucking stupid crazy as our far right. And all of them, the extremists from both the far left and the far right...can go fuck themselves...in a Merry Chickie, Gifting, Wreath and Holly wrapped Reindeer, Christmasy way. :)
Michigan State University’s “Inclusive Guide” includes a slew of words it recommends people avoid, including words that could be associated with Christian religious holidays. The guide advised against using words including the words “‘merry’ or ‘Christmas trees,’ ‘wreaths,’ ‘holly,’ ‘bells,’ ‘gifts,’ ‘reindeer,’ ‘bunnies,’ ‘eggs’ and ‘chicks,'” its document reads.
Anyway, the proof is and has always been there. Fox News just admitted they lie nonstop, and have been for decades. Now, let Fox News sycophants get back to what matters to them...that born rich white guy, Kid Rock, (Kid Rock was born Robert James Ritchie in Romeo, Michigan. The son of Susan and William Ritchie, who owned multiple car dealerships. He was raised in his father's large home on extensive property where he regularly helped his family pick apples and care for their horses.) who pretends to be a "southern boy" shooting cases of Bud Light with a machine gun because...trans people exist. :)
Side note...can you tell, I am having a wonderful and joyful day? :)
Someone e-mailed me with questions about being sexually dominant and also being shy, quiet and introverted. I don't think being dominant, submissive, a switch etc...has anything to do with what was described. Some people are introverts, some people are extroverts, some people sort of tend to switch back and forth, but that doesn't have any bearing on their sexual interests, persuasions or preferences.
Some people equate being introverted or shy with social anxiety. A lot of anxiety can be from upbringing, it can also be exacerbated by diet, fatigue, medications, daily stress, medical issues, chemical imbalances, obviously for some people it can be due to PTSD and I'm sure there are a myriad of other reasons, and in some cases a combination of many. But if someone wants to...say, for example, tie someone up, beat them with a paddle and then grind on their face...that's not influenced or connected to someones nervousness in public speaking, or maybe having agoraphobia, or just not liking certain social situations. I think people should follow their nature and interests, their desires and fantasies, and they should do what they want, what turns them on, press forward, find a person (or people) that they meld with...and enjoy their life.
On another level, people do what so many of the rest of us do or have done, meaning overanalyzing things. We live in a messed up repressive society when it comes to anything sexual, more so anything alternative sexually where being thought of as a freak, a pervert, and regret, self-loathing, remorse, guilt and so on are prevalent, based on lies and myths that defy a human beings true nature. No one else can fix whatever happens within your life, relationships, marriage or whatever, but at least try to not beat yourself down for having urges that are totally normal, and seek inner peace with being how you are.
For myself, without kink, without that passion, the "heat", that spark, that take your breath away feeling...I'd rather just read a book. Yes, regular sex is fine sometimes, rarely, it still exists in my life, but so many people today place more value on "quantity" instead of "quality" so they're missing that crucial component. Having multiple partners or doing some sort of kink related thing daily is not high on my list. Having worthy experiences, memorable ones, fantastic earthquake, fireworks, explosive events, means far more to me than just having a high body count or engaging in anything and everything kink related, as if I have some sort of list to check boxes on.
What I Do Not Miss About Fetlife, Kink Forums and Social Media.
Not sure why I thought of this earlier, but, one thing that baffled me when I was still associated with those sorts of sites, was when certain people would endlessly call every post a "wank post". Okay. So even if they were...why would that be bad or wrong?
I mean, that's what erotica is. It's the point of all salacious stories, porn, everything from Playboy to hardcore skin magazines of yesteryear...the old style Pinup photos, all are/were done to arouse and entice and to get someone off. That's also what some Rom-Coms are, and 50 Shades of Grey, both the books and movies. That's what soft-porn is for, sexual arousal, no matter if its history or fiction, or a combination of both.
That's what erotic cave drawings, made a gazillion years ago were for.
It's probable that someone tried to send some sort of erotic message through smoke signals, or on a SOS machine, and maybe (privately) NASA allowed astronauts wives to send them some "wank fodder" when they were on the Apollo missions. The moment the written word was invented, someone wrote out some smut.
Every type of camera, tintype, daguerreotype, cameras that made slideshows, Polaroids, 8MM, video, digital cameras, webcams, text message, sexting...you name it and humankind has used it in some way to arouse, get off, beat off, slap off, whack off and whatever other terms one might use.
So really, someone accusing others of that, makes as much sense as someone saying:
People only go to restaurants to eat.
Yeah. And?
Or saying people only go to the movies to be entertained.
Yep, that's the point.
Or accusing someone of going to a sports event because they...like sports.
It makes no sense, and sort of clues one in on the fact that a person making this claim, simply does not understand forums, sex sites, social media, the Internet, or human sexuality. Far too many people just sit on the sidelines, waiting for others to post something, then attack or critique it and the author, which is one of the reasons I just deleted all social media months or years ago...and don't miss it. For those that post something, somewhere, that have a blog, that initiate conversations or post stories on forums, you are fucking awesome and are doubly so, if you just ignore the trolling trolls who troll for a lack of anything better to do. Now then, anyone can feel free to masturbate while reading this missive I just wrote as it could be, may be, just might be...a wank post, lol. :)
"HAPPY EASTER TO ALL, INCLUDING THOSE THAT DREAM ENDLESSLY OF DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY BECAUSE THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF DREAMING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE," he ranted. "THOSE THAT ARE SO INCOMPETENT THEY DON'T REALIZE THAT HAVING A BORDER AND POWERFUL WALL IS A GOOD THING, & HAVING VOTER I.D., ALL PAPER BALLOTS, & SAME DAY VOTING WILL QUICKLY END MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD, & TO ALL OF THOSE WEAK & PATHETIC RINOS, RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS, SOCIALISTS MARXISTS, & COMMUNISTS WHO ARE KILLING OUR NATION, REMEMBER, WE WILL BE BACK!"
"THE ONLY REASON I HAVE THESE ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS INVESTIGATIONS AGAINST ME , HEADED UP BY RACISTS, LUNATICS, AND RADICAL LEFT MANIACS, IS FOR PURPOSES OF ELECTION INTERFERENCE," Trump claimed. "IT WILL BE HARDER FOR THE DEMOCRATS TO CHEAT LIKE THEY DID IN 2020, SO THEY ARE GOING RIGHT TO THE OLD SOVIET UNION PLAYBOOK AND USING THE DOJ, FBI & OTHERS IN 'JUSTICE' TO INTERFERE IN OUR ONCE SACRED ELECTIONS. WE’VE GOT TO SWAMP THESE CHEATERS, AND WE WILL WIN!"
The thing about extended positioning for oral service is...she's either seated, laying, prone or supine. Unless someone has the ability to levitate, I'm not aware of any other angles or positions that would work. If she's laying, and you got "Lickers Neck Ache"...elevating your bed or a chair is the only way I can think of to avoid that issue. Unless one had a barber chair of sorts, where she could lay back and use foot stirrups, but that would still be her seated, you down under. The only difference being if she's high enough, you'd be seated and with a straight neck/spine. Or you could go all Tarzan and have a hammock of some nature hanging from the ceiling. But now I'm getting into the realms of the imponderable, so consider a Queening chair, or not, but either way, I will cease babbling...and go see if I can find my pants. :)
I think any ad, posted anywhere, regardless of the forum or theme of the site, that is overtly blunt or direct, is not going to yield good results. Ads that seem like the person is ordering up someone (vanilla, kinky, dominant, submissive, whatever) from a drive thru are ubiquitous and are usually ignored, for good reason. They generally read as someone desiring an "employee" who will focus on their needs, desires and pleasure, rather than someone seeking a *whole* person to spend time with, and possibly spend their lives together. And within the BDSM realm, they will be tagged as originating from a "Do me sub". And no one likes that.
Placing an ad that comes from someone appearing to be well rounded, rational and sane, listing some general interests and hobbies is what would garner views and possible connections. And guys, keep in mind, confidence is sexy (as is a sense of humor and empathy). As per confidence, if it appears that someone is desperate, meaning they failed in their search on fetish sites, and are now trolling vanilla sites, that reeks that they're not scoring well and screams "Alert" and caution flags go up.
But beyond writing an ad that shows a balanced person behind it, interjecting certain words or terms that imply a healthy and alternative sex drive should not be a deal breaker. Mentioning that you prefer a "take charge" woman, that you love to know she's sated and happy, are not averse to compersion, are somewhat obeisant and malleable, should catch the eye of any woman that is so inclined to desiring a mate that supports that type of lifestyle. But as a caveat, I should mention that I've never been to a dating site, of any sort, so possibly have no idea what the hell I'm talking about. :)
Just a minor point, but not everyone engages in verbal negotiations and talks about limits, fantasies, safe words and so on. Something to consider when in the intial stages of "sexy talk" or sexting or whatever the hell people do. For some people, the whole thing just sort of evolves, it just grows and happens, without much more than a small verbal cue, or a nod of the head. Reactions, interest, disgust, favorites, lust and passion is gauged from body language, from breathing, panting, moans, groans and orgasms.
And for those already in a relationship, regardless of the dynamic and what someone might have a fantasy for...if someone feels the need to "push" their spouse into something, whatever it is, where that genuine interest doesn't already exist...its not going to go well in the long run, and sometimes not in the immediate either. Enthusiasm is always good...if its directed towards the goal of a mutually rewarding experience & lives. The operative word being "mutually". Maybe consider, if kink is involved, not getting hung up on the verbiage, the titles, the rituals and all that initially either, as for some people, it can be too intense and even intimidating. For myself, I don't feel the need to draw a distinction between sex, power and control. All three can be interconnected and there is this fluidity that combines them into what is...just me. I don't need a title and all the accouterments, the whole production that seems to increasingly be shown as what a "FemDom" is, or is supposed to say, do, look like, wear and all that nonsense mostly depicted from the porn industry. In other words, and no idea if this will even resonate with most people these days....dominant women? Yeah...we don't need no stinking badges. :)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)