Okay, so hear me out on this, lol. Let me develop my point. First off, I am not a "Royal Watcher", by any means, so I know very little about this or them. However, it's been on the back of my mind, just a faint thought, for years. Charles meets Camilla many decades ago, they have a fling, then he meets Diana and is pressured into marrying her. He's still seeing Camilla, we all know the tragic story, Diana is gone, Charles hooks back up with Camilla, publicly, and they wed. Got it.
Sure, there could be a bond, some mutual interests in hobbies, art, culture, global events, history, whatever, where Charles and Camilla might be better suited for each other, more so than Charles and Diana were. And while Camilla is/was an attractive woman in her own right, Diana was much more the "beauty queen", more fashionable, stylish, engaging, the media, public, cameras and TV loved her.
However, and this was part of Diana's charm, she sort of came across, at least in the early years, as the "virginal" good girl, the nice sweet innocent young thing, coquettish, but in a naive way, whereas Camilla seems a bit "rougher" around the edges, more experienced, bossy, demanding, domineering, but in a motherly sort of way.
Charles has had a very unique life, odd, strange, and his own mother seemed a tad distant and even "cold" due to her own upbringing, her generation, her duties and obligations, maintaining her image and all that. So, without going into a whole bunch of psychobabble, was Charles always longing for affection from a "motherly" woman, melded with a certain firmness, a "MomDom" of sorts, which drew him to Camilla, who seems to display some of those characteristics, far more so than Diana ever did?
I mean, all those jodhpurs, leather boots, riding gear, the equestrian accouterments, the leather, saddles, bridles, the riding crops...I've picked up on a vibe that suggests some of that might have been used on more than just the horses. Or is it...just me? I mean...Le Vice Anglais, translates to "The Englishmans Vice" mostly meaning spanking, beating, BDSM etc...you know, they fucking "invented" it, lol, or at least popularized it. Or, maybe I'm totally wrong...and just need a hobby. :)
Vanessa!
ReplyDeleteThat’s so funny:)!
I have thought the same thing for years!:)
He’s a very awkward unsure man when you watch him
And she is the very epitome the strict English matriarch:)
I’m betting she strictly canes his bare bottom regularly!
Yours always
WC:)
Brilliant "Stable Genius" Minds....think alike. :)
DeleteWho knows, who cares? If she is then i am happy for them both, for him for having met and found someone he clearly loves and to her for having done the same.
ReplyDeleteNow, can be just get on and abolish the fucking nonsense that is the royal family?
p
x
"Now, can be just get on and abolish the fucking nonsense that is the royal family?"
DeleteUmm...*we* did. :)
I think it most possible. I've held that opinion for quite some time. I doubt Charles was ever caned as a young man, but I can imagine him wanting that type of attention. Camilla does indeed seem the type to be "the lady in public and Dominatrix in the bedroom"! Hell, I'd let her have at me!!!
ReplyDeleteSound and valid point on by him in his youth, being privileged. And yes, who knows what they get up to now. :)
DeleteVanessa:
ReplyDeleteI think you may be onto something there between the King and Camila.
For certain, over the years, there have been many subtle and not so subtle hints, and teases, in books, and plays, and in other media, from Great Britain about spanking….much of it indicating that in particular many of the upper crust gentlemen enjoy having their bottoms warmed by a female partner…
Supposedly a consequence of attending private boarding schools where disciplined reigned supreme, and the rod was not spared…and often I suspect by some over enthusiastic teachers and administrators…both male and female. And also some attribute the spanking desire and the liking of D/S play to growing up with nannies.
As a result many of us outside of England have been left with a mystique that England is the spanking capital of the world…as well as populated by one kinky group of folks.
And I can imagine that serving and bowing and submitting to royalty; i.e. a Queen in this case; might bleed over in many a man’s personal life to his “Queen” that waits for him at home.
The extended Royal family of England does have somewhat of a reputation of being quite promiscuous; and also there are hints at being ultra kinky.
I wouldn’t be surprised to find that the furniture that you design and produce got its name and perhaps inception from some enterprising female member of royalty; perhaps even from a Queen herself….
It is fun to speculate and think about prominent folks, just being like the rest of us.
Thanks for sharing…..have a nice weekend.
hs
Quite an accurate dissertation of some facts about the kinky Brits, and yes, some speculation on all are parts as well. Either way, by the sheer numbers and averages of fetishy people on the planet, no doubt some, at the very least, have some type of "thing" going on. :)
DeleteI’ll leave aside the motivations of Charles.
ReplyDeleteI’m hugely attracted to the equestrian thing as one of my many submissive fantasies. Boots, jodhpurs etc. Irene keeps a riding crop. If only there were crotchless jodhpurs for pussy licking.
We used to sneak into to the tack room at a local horse stable where there were a dozen riding crops hanging on the wall. Irene would take my pants down and thrash me soundly. We were never caught but we certainly worried about it.
I’m still often the stable boy in our role play.
Rosco
Crotchless Jodhpurs...heck of a good idea. I'm with you on all the leather related stuff, the touch, feel, the smell, love it. And good for Irene for using a variety of riding crops. :)
DeleteYou’re on to something. But go back to the infamous phone hack, where Charles was caught chatting with Camilla while married to Diane, and his references to wanting to be her tampon? It could get way kinkier than spanking, into the whole shrunken guy / giantess fetish. Mick
ReplyDeleteI'm not even aware with that whole "thing"...but it does sound a bit on the...wild side, that's for sure lol. :)
DeleteSee
ReplyDeleteMick knows all kind of things!
Thanks Mick:)
WC
So the question is….
ReplyDeleteWhat will Charles be wearing under his trousers at his coronation?
Panties?
A cock cage?
A red bottom?
The world wonders
WC
Camilla's bloomers? :)
DeleteA butt plug?
ReplyDeleteWC:)
Royal Rectum Retention Apparatus?
DeleteDare I say……
ReplyDeleteA bra?
WC:)
Sure...gotta control those old guy man-boobies right?
DeleteHer bra?:)
ReplyDeleteHope it has strong underwriting and a tight strap Vanessa!
ReplyDeleteWC:)
Underwriting...or underwiring?
DeleteOops:)
DeleteTypo:)
Vanessa
ReplyDeleteWe need to put Mick to work covering the Coronation for us:)
He’s quite the authority on all things femdom….
Truly:)
How about it Mick?
WC